Experiencing Technical Difficulties (resonant) wrote,
Experiencing Technical Difficulties

Noisemaking weapons

During combat operations, the Canadian Forces are trained to use suppressing fire. This consists of shooting in the general direction of the opposing force, so they have to take cover and cannot aim to shoot accurately at the Canadian forces. This is effective, but all those stray rounds keep flying for great distances, and can hit civilians far from the area. It also uses up a lot of ammunition very quickly, which increases the risk of running out at a bad time.

This ammunition is being fired off to give an audible message meaning, "Warning! I am pointing a gun at you, please duck". So, why not skip the ammunition and go straight to the audible message?

Let's suppose we mount a pair of speakers on the rail of the C7, in forward-facing tubes, playing irritating tones of slightly different frequencies. When the barrel is pointing towards you with the speakers playing, you'd hear a really loud beat frequency, rattling like a machine gun. As the barrel swings away to either side, the noise would drop off rapidly. With a few seconds of observation, people would learn to hear when they are being targeted, and would duck accordingly.

So, instead of suppressing fire, the first step would be to click on the speakers and point weapons at the opponents. Actual ammunition would only be fired if the opponents did not duck. The Canadian Forces would save ammunition, and civilians would have fewer stray projectiles punching through the walls of their houses. Fewer opponents would be shot, but shooting opponents isn't the primary goal of suppressing fire anyway.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.